Christine Smith put out a
somewhat controversial essay which said that, unlike some other libertarians, she would not compromise principle.
The first time I saw it was on the LP Radicals yahoo group, and given that I have recently volunteered to help the caucus members make more informed decisions about the various LP Presidential candidates, I thought of a few questions to ask.
They have been up for several days, and I also since posted them on several other yahoo groups on which Christine Smith posted the same message. I am hoping that the candidate sees the questions and responds to them. Several people have said that she is not very good about getting back to people, but this is the first time I have personally tried to get a hold of her, so for now I will keep an open mind.
I’m guessing she’s just been busy, so I hope maybe posting them here will help bring these questions to her attention.
OK, here they are:
I have gathered there are no issues on which you think the 2004
platform was too extreme. Is my understanding correct? If not, what do
you think may have been too extreme?
Are there any issues on which you think the 2004 platform was not
libertarian enough? If so, what issues, and what was inadequate about
Do you think the platform should be about the length of the 2004
platform or that of the 2006 platform? Somewhere in between? Longer
than both? Shorter than both?
What issues, if any, do you think are the most glaring omissions?
When did you join the Libertarian Party?
Prior to running for President, in what ways were you involved in the
Libertarian Party or libertarian movement? What other libertarian
movement groups have you been involved with, and what was the extent
of your involvement?
In what ways do you plan to be involved if you do not get the
If you lose the Presidential nomination and are offered the VP
nomination, would you consider it?
Have you ever run for office with another party or as an independent
candidate? If so, where and when, and for what office?
Have your views changed during this campaign? If so, on what issues
Do you plan to share all contacts your campaign generates with the
national party? Would you characterize your present working
relationship with LPHQ and/or LNC to be friendly or somewhat adversarial?
Do you have any significant involvement in issue organizations or
political coalitions which intersect with libertarianism but also
include significant numbers of non-libertarians? (for instance, Steve
Kubby has been active in medical marijuana legalization and the drug
policy reform movement; George Phillies is active with his local ACLU
chapter; Wayne Root claims he can reach out to internet gamblers on a
Steve Gordon has criticized your position on the middle east wars,
claiming that you said that you would evacuate the troops and leave
their equipment behind. Is that an accurate description of your position?
Do you believe the national party platform (past or present) would be
adequate to serve as your campaign platform, or do you plan to have a
separate campaign platform if you are nominated?
Are there any innovative ways in which you hope your campaign will
work to surpass all previous LP Presidential results, and what do you
think your chances are of doing that?
How much of an emphasis do you plan to put on working with local
candidates and building state and local LPs? Ballot access? Youth and
Have you spoken to large crowds not just of
libertarians? (For example, Steve Kubby spoke at Hempfest, estimated
attendance 50,000, and I believe George Phillies said he spoke at
MassCann, which is also a large legalization event).
Also: have you played a significant role in passing any legislation
that actually made people more free? (Steve Kubby helped write and
pass prop 215, California’s medical marijuana law).
As I mentioned, Steve Gordon also has
some questions for Ms. Smith which he has been trying to get her to answer through several phone and email attempts for several days.
Steve Kubby has some concerns, too.
Hopefully we’ll hear back!