Originally posted on The Jeffersonian:
I was thinking today about the way we use the word hoax, perhaps because Connecticut at last released the Sandy Hook 911 recordings, almost a year after that schoolhouse massacre. Some skeptics referred to the shooting as if the deaths themselves were faked. Anything is possible, and in this environment, we shouldn’t rule anything out too quickly. Nevertheless, when people refer to a crime as a hoax, that doesn’t necessarily mean the crime itself is faked. They want to say that the official account of the crime is faked.
In case after case, the people responsible for investigating a crime act like co-conspirators who want to hide what actually happened. In the Sandy Hook case, people came at three in the morning to spirit the bodies away. No one, not even the children’s parents, were permitted to say goodbye to the children they had seen off to school the previous morning. What could possibly make someone think of such a thing?
To this day, fifty-one weeks after the massacre, no detailed autopsy results are public. No detailed forensic evidence from inside the school is public. In fact, Newtown razed the school with no public investigation of the events inside the school. We don’t even have an accounting of the bullets recovered from the bodies, and from the crime scene. How could that happen? The state’s attorney general resisted releasing even the 911 calls. He resisted right until the superior court judge ruled the attorney general’s arguments “without merit.” Every argument used to withhold public records had no foundation, in law or in common sense.